I left a neutral feedback for someone a couple of years ago saying "email for report" and my email because the 6 months were up but there were still issues of things that were never delivered. He since delivered them and I was still unhappy with the sale but now he is asking for me to remove my "negative feedback" which I never clicked negative but he said it effects his rating. There is no way to change it though?
Why can't the feedback reflect the current feeling of the buyer but has to be made up too early and then can't be changed?

Why do you let people make outrageous revenue/traffic claims without any documentation? Much of it is photo-shopped Paypal ledgers with no way to prove it is legit for the site for sale. You don't enforce your own policies! Proof is enclosed below.

This puts buyer's at risk and destroys site credibility.

Flippa Site Rule/Policy/User Agreement Violated (Revenue And/Or Traffic Evidence)

-Any claims to revenue or traffic in a listing must to supported by evidence. Any claims to potential revenue or traffic in a listing must clearly marked as such and be accompanied by robust workings and assumptions

Here is proof in the form of a random audit on 3-6-13. It shows over $200k worth of listing with only 11% actually conforming to your own site rules. Screen shot available upon request.

Audit of Flippa Auctions Claiming Revenue over $2K
3-6-13 1:50 PM EST (Screen Shot Available)

Total Auctions: 13
Auctions with Confidentiality Agreements: 4
Other Auctions: 9
Number of Valid Auctions According to Flippa Policies: 1 (VirtualPowerHosting.com)
Percentage of Valid Auctions: 11%
Invalid Auctions:8
Total Bids: $56,536
Total Reserves Without Bids: $160,000
Auctions with New Sellers: 4
(3 New-No sales or feedback and 1 New-Sales: $200)

Auction reported to Flippa for following Site Rules Violations (8)

Flippa Site Rule/Policy/User Agreement Violated (Revenue And/Or Traffic Evidence)

-Any claims to revenue or traffic in a listing must to supported by evidence. Any claims to potential revenue or traffic in a listing must clearly marked as such and be accompanied by robust workings and assumptions

Tripatlas (Revenue) Bids: $45,100 Seller: diamondgroup (new)
PowerPlusTraffic.Com (Traffic ) Also URL Below. Bids: $131 Seller: OnlineInvest
Easy-Link.net (Traffic) Less than one month data Bids: $300 Seller: dimpap
halloweencostumes.net (Fraudulent Revenue Claims) Reserve: $100,000 Seller: costumesgalore (New) Asking $100,000. 3 month Revenue Avg. Claimed: Over $225k per month. FY 2012 Total Revenues: $ 234K
IslaNegra.org ( Revenue) Non Verifiable Paypal Screen Shots) Bids: $100 Seller: EntSolutions
comparesuite.com (Revenue and Traffic) Reserve: $60,000 Seller: alexsgs (New-Only 200 sales.

Flippa Site Rule/Policy/User Agreement Violated:
If the site was established on a different URL in the last 12 months, the original Site Established date can only be used when the original URL is included in the sale.

PowerPlusTraffic.Com (Traffic) Seller: OnlineInvest (Also Revenue Above)

Flippa Site Rule/Policy/User Agreement Violated:
Sites with less than two months of revenue history are not able to claim revenue in their financials or listing title/description.
obtainfans.com Seller: EntSolutions

Flippa Site Rule/Policy/User Agreement Violated:

Policy 4.3b which states are engaged in activities which contravene the law of any territory; or contravene any provision of the Rules
hyipdata.com (Admitted Ponzi Scheme by Seller mikestatf (New)

I have found a few sites being sold on Flippa as having the vast majority of their traffic coming from India. Is there a way to check to confirm this isn't some sort of scam to boost their levels and numbers on Alexa and with their PR? It is awfully strange that each of the higher PR sites I viewed, which are less than a year or 2 old have pr3 or higher and a great Alexa rank and they each had 90% or better of their traffic coming from India. I honestly believe there is some sort of scam running amuck to boost the numbers to encourage higher sale prices.